Second Global
Workshop on Digital Soil Mapping
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Scientists from five continents
converged 4-7 July 2006 in Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil,
to participate in the Second Global Workshop on Digital Soil Mapping, which
focused on regions and countries with sparse soil data infrastructures. Following a stunning field trip that
transected the range in soils, landscapes, and land-uses of the Rio De Janeiro state, the
3-day workshop consisted of five sessions on various aspects on DSM, each with
a keynote address, several scientific presentations, and discussion.

The workshop began with Dr.
Philippe Lagacherie, INRA-Montpellier,
France,
reviewing the state-of-the-art of digital soil mapping (DSM). Lagacherie proposed that a significant
challenge for DSM is the effective integration of DSM into existing soil survey
programs and data. The session
addressing the DSM challenges of dealing with limited spatial data structures
was launched by Dr. Andy Jarvis, CIAT, CGIAR, Colombia. Jarvis emphasized there is a great potential
for global digital soil information, especially if DSM can provide soil
property data at spatial resolutions useful for decision-making in less
developed countries. The DSM protocol,
quality, availability, and capacity building session included the keynote by
Dr. Robert MacMillan, LandMapper Environmental Solutions, Inc., Canada,
illustrating experiences with applied DSM, noting that accuracy assessment was
becoming increasingly important. Dr. Budiman Minasny, The University of Sydney,
Australia, presented the keynote lecture on new DSM methodologies, reviewing
technological advances in hardware (e.g., remote sensing) and software (e.g.,
data models that infer mechanisms vs. black box approaches that mine data but
do not infer mechanisms). Minasny
suggested a hybrid approach to DSM, where soil knowledge drives both data
mining and modeling approaches. The
session on examples of DSM to predict soil properties began with the keynote by
Dr. A-Xing Zhu, University of
Wisconsin, USA,
improving the efficiency of field mapping by using a similarity index to
represent soil distribution in transitional areas. Dr. Thomas Mayr, Cranfield University, U.K.,
commenced the session on examples of DSM to predict soil classes with a keynote
addressing the difficulties and potentials of using legacy soil survey data for
modeling soil distribution in new areas.
Mayr stressed the importance of data preparation, identifying missing
data, and understanding the limitations of model feature space.
The diversity
of thought-provoking presentations in each session sparked constructive debate.
Final discussion elucidated specific priorities for the development and
implementation of DSM, including 1) data (DSM should be data-driven); 2)
training (train students as well as established soil surveyors); 3) standards
and standardization (document DSM methods and measures of uncertainty); 4)
international collaboration (IUSS working group can facilitate this, but should
work towards funding international projects); and 5) marketing (work to develop
interest and investment in DSM at home and abroad).
The organizing committee was co-chaired by Dr. Maria
de Lourdes “Lou” Mendonça-Santos of EMBRAPA
Solos, Brazil,
and Dr. Alex McBratney of The University of Sydney, Australia. Lou and her colleagues at EMBRAPA and CPRM
were gracious hosts of this stimulating meeting in the dramatic setting of Rio de Janeiro.
More details see www.digitalsoilmapping.org
Janis L. Boettinger
Utah State University
USA